NHL player testifying at sex assault trial of former Canadian world junior teammates


Notice: Undefined variable: newid in D:\vertrigo\www\voice\see.php on line 32



Some background on consent videos

This trial centres on the issue of consent, as the Crown’s opening statements stressed.

Earlier today, the jury saw a video of the complainant, known as E.M. under a publication ban, asking if she’s “OK with all this stuff,” and her responding, “Yeah, I’m OK.”

In the second video, at 4:26 a.m., E.M., wearing no clothing, is shown holding a towel in front of her chest.

She says, “It was all consensual. Are you recording me? K, good,” E.M. says. “You are so paranoid. Holy. I enjoyed it. It was fine. I’m so sober — that’s why I can’t do this right now.”

I spoke to Kaitlynn Mendes, who’s not involved with this trial, about consent videos. She’s a sociology professor and holds the Canada Research Chair in Inequality and Equity at Western University in London. She’s also an expert in technology-facilitated sexual violence.

Mendes says consent videos aren’t new — they’re meant to pre-empt accusations that a sexual encounter was not consensual.

She says they became a “thing” during the #MeToo movement, which gained international prominence in 2017, focused on addressing sexual harassment and abuse, particularly in the workplace.

Mendes says there’s controversy over consent videos because “consent is something that can only really happen in the moment … consent has to be ongoing. It's something that can be withdrawn at any point.”

So, for example, if someone has consented to having sex with one person and a second person enters the room or they want to change acts, the participants need to get consent, in the moment, for everything happening, adds Mendes.

“That’s really the only case in which these videos I think could really stand up,” she says, acknowledging the act of recording a video in that moment is also complicated.

Mendes hasn’t seen the consent videos in the world junior hockey case, but has some questions about the context in which they were recorded, including: Who was in the room? Was there coercion or threats? Was the complainant sober and able to consent?

“We don't know whether it was like, ‘Hey, you need to record this video before you're allowed to leave.’ Are there other people standing around intimidating you? … Do they feel as though they're being coerced into saying that, yes, this was consensual?”



Source link

Posted: 2025-04-30 21:15:26

Gardeners urged to place cucumber slices around plants
 



... Read More

‘A mix of vaudeville and David Lynch’: the hit play about a giant rabbit on a psychoanalyst’s couch | Theatre
 



... Read More

Places to get 'best' tea in London – Fortnum and Mason to The Shard | UK | News
 



... Read More

What are the chances of Earth being hit by a big asteroid?
 



... Read More

How to remove rust from pots and pans by using one vegetable
 



... Read More

Lady Gabriella Windsor shares what Princess Kate was like to work with | Royal | News
 



... Read More

Mohammed Siraj punished by ICC over angry incident in England vs India Test | Cricket | Sport
 



... Read More

Baked beans recipe will be ‘a huge hit with the family’ with surprising ingredient
 



... Read More